|
66%
vivo Y71i
₹9,990
(Out of Stock)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo Y71i vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the vivo Y71i vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while vivo Y71i runs at 1.4 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while vivo Y71i offers 6 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both vivo Y71i and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo Y71i and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both vivo Y71i and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while vivo Y71i offers 3360 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo Y71i offers 16 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
vivo Y71i
₹9,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
23 Jul, 2018
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 425
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1440 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3360 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(6,154 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 23, 2018
(Official)
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v15
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.4 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
28 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 308
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1440 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
78.77 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
84.4 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
155.8 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
75.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
150 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
Back: Aluminium
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0CMOS image sensor |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3360 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.16 W/kg Body: 0.96 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
N/A
|