|
73%
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
OPPO K3
₹24,500
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo Z1 Pro vs OPPO K3
Comparing the vivo Z1 Pro vs OPPO K3 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO K3 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,848, while vivo Z1 Pro scores 3,262, making OPPO K3 the better performer.
Display: vivo Z1 Pro offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while OPPO K3 offers 6.5 inches, making vivo Z1 Pro the larger display of the two. OPPO K3 features a AMOLED display compared to vivo Z1 Pro's IPS LCD, making OPPO K3 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo Z1 Pro and OPPO K3 feature a 16 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO K3 offers 16 MP, making vivo Z1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while OPPO K3 offers 3765 mAh, making vivo Z1 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both vivo Z1 Pro and OPPO K3 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO K3 is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO K3 has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO K3
₹24,500
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
03 Jul, 2019
|
23 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 712
|
Snapdragon 710
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
3765 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(360,568 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(9,405 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
109,750
AnTuTu Score
|
156,064
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
15h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 03, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 616
|
Adreno 616
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
109,750
|
156,064
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
19.9 %
|
21.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.17 %
|
84.47 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.77 %
|
91.1 %
|
Design
Height
|
162.39 mm
|
161.2 mm
|
Width
|
77.33 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.85 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
201 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7CMOS image sensor 1.22µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
3765 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
15h 38m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 49m 31s
|
1h 9m 24s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.752 W/kg Body: 0.402 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|