INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Coolpad 8260

+ Compare

View All Photos (4)

Coolpad 8260 is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Display

2.8 inches (7.11 cm); LCD
240x320 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 2 MP Primary Camera

General

5G Not Supported

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Coolpad 8260

View Alternatives

Gfive 7310i

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP

Smaller Screen: 1.8" (4.57 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Coolpad 8260 VS Gfive 7310i

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Standard Display: TFT vs LCD

Coolpad 8260 VS Lava Iris 406q

Coolpad 828

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 3.5" (8.89 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Lower Weight: 178 grams vs 185.7 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP

Coolpad 8260 VS Coolpad 828

Spice D-5555

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 76 grams vs 185.7 grams

Smaller Screen: 2" (5.08 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Coolpad 8260 VS Spice D-5555

Samsung Galaxy Star

Discontinued ₹3,599

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 3" (7.62 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Lower Weight: 102.5 grams vs 185.7 grams

Standard Display: TFT vs LCD

Coolpad 8260 VS Samsung Galaxy Star

Coolpad 8166

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 150 grams vs 185.7 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP

Coolpad 8260 VS Coolpad 8166

Coolpad 8688

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 165 grams vs 185.7 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Coolpad 8260 VS Coolpad 8688

Micromax X50

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 113 grams vs 185.7 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Coolpad 8260 VS Micromax X50

Micromax Q3 ezpad

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 97 grams vs 185.7 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP

Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Coolpad 8260 VS Micromax Q3 ezpad

Coolpad 2938

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 110 grams vs 185.7 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Coolpad 8260 VS Coolpad 2938

Coolpad 8260 Specifications

Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

Display
Display Type	LCD
Screen Size	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
Resolution	240x320 px
Pixel Density	143 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	34.34 %

Design
Height	116 mm
Width	61 mm
Thickness	23.00 mm
Weight	185.7 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	2 MP

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery
TalkTime	Up to 3(2G)

Storage
Expandable Storage	Yes

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Dual SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	No
Bluetooth	Yes
GPS	Yes with A-GPS

Multimedia
Video Player	Yes, Video Formats: MPEG4
Music	Yes, Music Formats: Yes, MP3 Player

Sensors
Java	Yes
Browser	Yes
Phone Book	3000 Entries
SMS	Yes
MMS	Yes
Other Facilities	Document Viewer(Word/Excel/Powerpoint/PDF), Handwriting recognition software, Voice recording, Caller filter function, PC Sync, Alarm clock, World clock, Calendar, Calculator, Memo, Predictive text input

            Coolpad 8260 Key Highlights
            
                  Display
                  2.8", 240 x 320 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  2 MP