comscore-tracking

iQOO Neo 10 vs vivo T4 Ultra

Share  

Comparing the iQOO Neo 10 vs vivo T4 Ultra across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: vivo T4 Ultra scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 7,101, while iQOO Neo 10 scores 6,913, making vivo T4 Ultra the better performer.


Display: iQOO Neo 10 offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while vivo T4 Ultra offers 6.67 inches, making iQOO Neo 10 the larger display of the two. Both iQOO Neo 10 and vivo T4 Ultra feature the same AMOLED display.


Rear Camera: Both iQOO Neo 10 and vivo T4 Ultra feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.


Front Camera: Both iQOO Neo 10 and vivo T4 Ultra feature a 32 MP primary front camera.


Battery: iQOO Neo 10 delivers longer battery life with 15h 39m, while vivo T4 Ultra delivers 13h 34m, making iQOO Neo 10 the better pick for all day usage.


Storage: vivo T4 Ultra offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while iQOO Neo 10 offers 128 GB, making vivo T4 Ultra the better option for storage.


Expert Review: iQOO Neo 10 receives a higher expert rating of 8.5 from the editorial team, while vivo T4 Ultra is rated 7.9.


User Rating: iQOO Neo 10 and vivo T4 Ultra both receive the same user rating of 4.5.

...read more
iQOO Neo 10
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
vivo T4 Ultra
₹35,999
(Out of Stock)
Add to Compare

Summary

Spec Score

91%
91%

Release Date

05 2025
06 2025

Performance

Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Octa Core (upto 3.2 GHz)
Octa Core (upto 3.4 GHz)
8 GB RAM
8 GB RAM

Display

6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
AMOLED
AMOLED
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
144 Hz Refresh Rate
120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera

50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
N/A
50 MP
Periscope Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)

Front Camera

32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens

Battery

7000 mAh
5500 mAh
120W Flash Charging
90W Flash Charging
No Wireless Charging
No Wireless Charging

Storage

128 GB
256 GB
UFS 3.1
UFS 3.1

Expert Review

8.5/10
7.9/10

Pros

  • Solid performance
  • Punchy display
  • Decent cameras
  • Speedy charging
  • Bright AMOLED display
  • Smooth performance
  • Reliable & versatile cameras

Cons

  • No telephoto camera
  • Pre-installed apps
  • Battery smaller than competitors
  • Sub-par IP64 rating

User Ratings

4.5/5
(2,205 ratings)
4.5/5
(6,789 ratings)

Compare in 360 View

Video

Videos
2 More Videos
Videos
1 More Video

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

May 26, 2025
(Official)
June 18, 2025
(Official)

Operating System

Android v15
Android v15

OS Updates

3 Years
3 Years

Security Updates

4 Years
4 Years

Custom UI

Funtouch OS
Funtouch OS

Performance

Performance Rating

Excellent
Excellent

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus

Processor

Octa core

3.2 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 2.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A720 2.02 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A720
Octa core

3.4 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.85 GHz, Tri core, Cortex X4 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit
64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm
4 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 825
Immortalis-G720 MC12

RAM

8 GB / 12 GB / 16 GB
8 GB / 12 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X Ultra
LPDDR5

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

2,066,325
1,945,482

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

16.0 s
19.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Display

Design

Rear Camera

Front Camera

Battery

Battery Test Results

Storage

Network & Connectivity

Multimedia

Sensors