Honor 8
Rs. 19,999
Honor 8 Pro
Rs. 29,999
Honor 9i
Rs. 8,999
Xiaomi Mi A1
Rs. 9,660
Honor 8 Lite
Rs. 8,999
OnePlus 5 64GB
Rs. 24,999
Moto G5S Plus
Rs. 11,599
|
|
|
|
The Honor 9 comes across as a more affordable Huawei P10
Jun 30 2017 By Nitansh Rastogi| RAM | 6 GB | |
| Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 960 | |
| Rear Camera | 12 MP + 20 MP | |
| Front Camera | 8 MP | |
| Battery | 3200 mAh | |
| Display | 5.1 inches |
| Brand | Honor | |
| Model | 9 | |
| Operating System | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | |
| SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM | |
| SIM Size |
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid) |
|
| Network |
4G: Available (supports Indian bands) 3G: Available, 2G: Available |
|
| Fingerprint Sensor |
|
|
| Quick Charging |
|
| Height | 147.3 mm Compare Size | |
| Width | 70.9 mm | |
| Thickness |
7.4 mm
Very Good
|
|
| Weight |
155 grams
Good
|
|
| Colours | Black, Blue, Grey, Amber Gold |
| Screen Size | 5.1 inches (12.95 cm) | |
| Screen Resolution | Full HD (1080 x 1920 pixels) | |
| Pixel Density |
432 ppi
Best in Class
|
|
| Display Type | IPS LCD | |
| Touch Screen |
Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
|
|
| Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 68.5 % |
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 | |
| Processor |
Octa core (2.36 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 + 1.84 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53)
Good
|
|
| Architecture | 64 bit | |
| Graphics | Mali-G71 MP8 | |
| RAM |
6 GB
Best in Class
|
| Internal Memory |
64 GB
Best in Class
|
|
| Expandable Memory |
Up to 256 GB
|
| Main Camera | ||
| Resolution |
12 MP + 20 MP Dual Primary Cameras
Very Good
|
|
| Sensor | CMOS image sensor | |
| Autofocus |
Phase Detection autofocus, Laser autofocus |
|
| Physical Aperture | F2.2 | |
| Flash |
Dual-color LED Flash |
|
| Image Resolution | 5160 x 3872 Pixels | |
| Settings | Exposure compensation, ISO control | |
| Shooting Modes | Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) | |
| Camera Features | Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus | |
| Video Recording | 3840x2160 @ 30 fps | |
| Front Camera | ||
| Resolution |
8 MP Front Camera
Average
|
|
| Flash |
 No |
|
| Capacity | 3200 mAh | |
| Type | Li-ion | |
| User Replaceable |
No
|
|
| Quick Charging |
Fast
|
| SIM Size | SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid) | |
| Network Support | 4G (supports Indian bands), 3G, 2G | |
| SIM 1 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) 3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
|
| SIM 2 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) 3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
|
| Wi-Fi |
Wi-Fi 802.11, a/ac/b/g/n/n 5GHz
|
|
| Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot | |
| Bluetooth |
v4.2
|
|
| GPS |
with A-GPS, Glonass
|
|
| NFC |
|
|
| USB Type-C |
(Doesn`t support micro-USB)
|
| FM Radio |
No
|
|
| Loudspeaker |
|
|
| Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
| Fingerprint Sensor |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Position | Front | |
| Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope |
Larger screen:
5.7 inches vs 5.1 inches
Higher battery capacity:
3400 mAH vs 3200 mAH
Higher pixel density:
515 ppi vs 432 ppi
Larger screen:
5.5 inches vs 5.1 inches
Higher primary camera resolution:
16 MP vs 12 MP
Higher battery capacity:
3400 mAH vs 3200 mAH
Larger screen:
5.7 inches vs 5.1 inches
Higher primary camera resolution:
22.5 MP vs 12 MP
Higher battery capacity:
4070 mAH vs 3200 mAH
Larger screen:
5.3 inches vs 5.1 inches
Faster processor:
Quad core 2.45 GHz vs Quad core 2.36 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
22.5 MP vs 12 MP
Larger screen:
5.15 inches vs 5.1 inches
Faster processor:
Quad core 2.45 GHz vs Quad core 2.36 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
3350 mAH vs 3200 mAH
Larger screen:
5.2 inches vs 5.1 inches
Lesser weight:
153 grams vs 155 grams
Slower processor:
Quad core 2.3 GHz vs Quad core 2.36 GHz
A
A
Ajay Verma
All of these phones come with almost the same specifications and at a similar price as well. But on comparing the contrasting feature, the Realme X seems to be a better option.
Let's compare the contrasting specifications-
Camera: Oppo K3 - 16 MP + 2 MP at the back,
16 MP at the front.
Realme X - 48 MP + 5 MP at the back,
16 MP at the front.
Honor 9x - 48 MP + 2 MP at the back,
16 MP at the front.
Storage: Oppo K3 - 64GB with expandable storage option.
Realme X - 128 GB with no expandable option.
Honor 9x - 64 GB with expandable storage option.
Display-Type: Oppo K3 - AMOLED (better)
Realme X - AMOLED (better)
Honor 9x - IPS LCD
Seeing all these feature, the Realme X does seem better but as the Honor 9X is the cheapest of all three, it can be good option also.
Check Full Comparison Oppo K3 vs Realme X vs Honor 9
Swastik Sharma
K
K
Kunal Pillai
P
P
Prachur Dutta
w
w
www.abhinavrox1234
Rs 13,999
Rs 12,750
Rs 64,890
Rs 16,499
Rs 28,258
Rs 8,999
Rs 11,718
Rs 9,299
Rs 8,990
Rs 36,990
Rs 37,999
Rs 17,700
Rs 99,900
Rs 16,990
Rs 53,999
Rs 14,000
Rs 9,240
Rs 16,790
Home | Privacy | Sitemap | About Us | Contact Us | Visitor Agreement | Terms & Conditions | 91mobiles Hindi | Feedback
© 91digital web private limited. All Rights Reserved.
