Micromax A50
+ Compare
₹6,499
(Last Known Price)
Micromax A50 is permanently discontinued.
Key Specs
Android
v2.3.6
(Gingerbread)
Performance
-
MediaTek -
Dual Core, 650 MHz -
256 MB RAM
Display
-
3.1 inches (7.87 cm); TFT -
360x480 px
Rear Camera
-
Single Camera Setup - 2 MP Primary Camera
Battery
-
1200 mAh
General
-
5G Not Supported -
512 MB internal storage, Expandable upto 32 GB
Add To Compare
See Full Specs
Competitors For Micromax A50
View Alternatives
Discontinued
₹5,299
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.2 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 256 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP
Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Higher Internal Memory: 4 MB vs 512 MB
Common Features
Display Type: TFT
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Lava Iris 406q
Discontinued
₹6,999
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Better Display: LCD vs TFT
Higher Battery Capacity: 1280 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Lower Internal Memory: 160 MB vs 512 MB
Higher Weight: 112 grams vs 110 grams
Common Features
RAM: 256 MB
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
Screen Size: 3.1" (7.87 cm)
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Micromax A52
Discontinued
₹6,999
This Competitor Has
Larger Screen: 3.5" (8.89 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1300 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Higher Weight: 120 grams vs 110 grams
Common Features
Processor: 650.0 Mhz
RAM: 256 MB
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
Display Type: TFT
Internal Memory: 512 MB
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Micromax A45
Discontinued
This Competitor Has
Better Display: LCD vs TFT
Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP
Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
J Star G3000
Discontinued
₹5,999
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Larger Screen: 3.2" (8.13 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1400 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Lower Weight: 104 grams vs 110 grams
Common Features
RAM: 256 MB
Internal Memory: 512 MB
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Celkon A95
Discontinued
₹11,235
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 832.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Better Display: LCD vs TFT
Lower Weight: 98 grams vs 110 grams
Smaller Screen: 3" (7.62 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Lower Internal Memory: 160 MB vs 512 MB
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
Battery Capacity: 1200 mAH
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Samsung Galaxy Y
Discontinued
₹11,980
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 832.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Higher RAM: 384 MB vs 256 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Better Display: LCD vs TFT
Higher Battery Capacity: 1300 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Lower Weight: 109 grams vs 110 grams
Common Features
Screen Size: 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Internal Memory: 512 MB
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Samsung Galaxy Y Duos
Discontinued
₹2,999
This Competitor Has
Higher RAM: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 3 MP vs 2 MP
Higher Internal Memory: 4 MB vs 512 MB
Lower Weight: 105 grams vs 110 grams
Slower Processor: 600.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Smaller Screen: 2.8" (7.11 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Lower Battery Capacity: 1100 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Common Features
Display Type: TFT
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Karbonn A1
Discontinued
₹6,999
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 800.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Larger Screen: 3.5" (8.89 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Higher Battery Capacity: 1420 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Common Features
Rear Camera Resolution: 2 MP
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Karbonn A5
Discontinued
₹6,656
This Competitor Has
Faster Processor: 1.0 Mhz vs 650.0 Mhz
Higher RAM: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP
Larger Screen: 3.8" (9.65 cm) vs 3.1" (7.87 cm)
Better Display: LCD vs TFT
Higher Battery Capacity: 1600 mAH vs 1200 mAH
Higher Internal Memory: 1 MB vs 512 MB
Higher Weight: 130 grams vs 110 grams
...show more
Micromax A50
VS
Karbonn A9
Micromax A50 Specifications
General
Performance
Display
Design
Rear Camera
Battery
Storage
Network & Connectivity
Multimedia
Sensors
General |
|
|---|---|
| Operating System | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) |
Performance |
|
|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek |
| Processor | Dual core, 650 MHz |
| Graphics (GPU) | PowerVR SGX 531 |
| RAM | 256 MB |
Display |
|
|---|---|
| Display Type | TFT |
| Screen Size | 3.1 inches (7.87 cm) |
| Resolution | 360x480 px |
| Pixel Density | 129 ppi |
| Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 43.2 % |
Design |
|
|---|---|
| Height | 113 mm |
| Width | 61 mm |
| Thickness | 13.00 mm |
| Weight | 110 grams |
Rear Camera |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | ||||
|
||||
| Image Resolution | 1600 x 1200 Pixels | |||
| Camera Features | Digital Zoom |
Battery |
|
|---|---|
| Capacity | 1200 mAh |
| Battery Type | Li-ion |
| TalkTime | Up to 4 Hours(2G) |
Storage |
|
|---|---|
| Internal Storage | 512 MB |
| Expandable Storage | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
Network & Connectivity |
|
|---|---|
| SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM |
| Network Support | 5G Not Supported |
| Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2 |
| GPS | Yes |
Multimedia |
|
|---|---|
| Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Sensors |
|
|---|---|
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer |
Micromax A50 User Reviews
4.2/5
Based on 309 ratings
Micromax A50 Key Highlights
| Processor | MediaTek |
| RAM & Storage | 256 MB + 512 MB |
| Display | 3.1", 360 x 480 Resolution |
| Rear Camera | 2 MP |
| Battery | 1200 mAh |
Popular Mobiles
Popular Links
- All Upcoming Phones
Latest Launches
- vivo X300 FE
- OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
- OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- vivo X300 Ultra
- realme 16T 5G
By Price
- Best Phones Under 10,000
- Best Phones Under 15,000
- Best Phones Under 20,000
- Best phones in any price range
Phones By Top Brands
- Samsung Mobiles
- Moto Mobiles
- vivo Mobiles
- OPPO Mobiles
- Tecno Mobiles
- OnePlus Mobiles
- realme Mobiles
