INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Mitac MIO A502

+ Compare

View All Photos (3)

Mitac MIO A502 is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Windows Mobile

Performance

TI OMAP 850
200 MHz
64 MB RAM

Display

2.7 inches (6.86 cm); LCD
240x320 px

Rear Camera

Single Camera Setup
- 2 MP Primary Camera
LED Flash

Battery

1050 mAh

General

5G Not Supported
64 MB internal storage, Non Expandable

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Mitac MIO A502

View Alternatives

Nokia 1508

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 68 grams vs 135 grams

Lower Internal Memory: 1 MB vs 64 MB

Mitac MIO A502 VS Nokia 1508

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Faster Processor: 1.2 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz

Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 64 MB

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP

Mitac MIO A502 VS Lava Iris 406q

Dopod S301

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 99 grams vs 135 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP

Smaller Screen: 1.2" (3.05 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)

Mitac MIO A502 VS Dopod S301

Fly Q200 Swivel

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 90 grams vs 135 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 850 mAH vs 1050 mAH

Mitac MIO A502 VS Fly Q200 Swivel

Samsung Corby 3G S3370

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 86 grams vs 135 grams

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 1 MP vs 2 MP

Smaller Screen: 2.6" (6.6 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)

Mitac MIO A502 VS Samsung Corby 3G S3370

Karbonn K68

Discontinued ₹1,699

This Competitor Has

Lower Rear Camera Resolution: 0 MP vs 2 MP

Smaller Screen: 2.4" (6.1 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 1050 mAH

Mitac MIO A502 VS Karbonn K68

Samsung S3500

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 95 grams vs 135 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 800 mAH vs 1050 mAH

Mitac MIO A502 VS Samsung S3500

HTC Wildfire S

Discontinued ₹5,799

This Competitor Has

Faster Processor: 600.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz

Higher RAM: 512 MB vs 64 MB

Higher Rear Camera Resolution: 5 MP vs 2 MP

Mitac MIO A502 VS HTC Wildfire S

Blackberry Pearl 8120

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Faster Processor: 312.0 Mhz vs 200.0 Mhz

Lower Weight: 90 grams vs 135 grams

Lower RAM: 32 MB vs 64 MB

Mitac MIO A502 VS Blackberry Pearl 8120

Videocon V1688

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 3.2" (8.13 cm) vs 2.7" (6.86 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 1050 mAH

Mitac MIO A502 VS Videocon V1688

Mitac MIO A502 Specifications

General Performance Display Design Rear Camera Battery Storage Network & Connectivity

General
Operating System	Windows Mobile

Performance
Chipset	TI OMAP 850
Processor	200 MHz, TI
RAM	64 MB

Display
Display Type	LCD
Screen Size	2.7 inches (6.86 cm)
Resolution	240x320 px
Pixel Density	148 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	39.61 %

Design
Height	95.7 mm
Width	59.6 mm
Thickness	20.70 mm
Weight	135 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

Camera	MP
Primary	2 MP

Flash

Yes, LED Flash

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery
Capacity	1050 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage
Internal Storage	64 MB
Expandable Storage	Yes

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Single SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	No
Bluetooth	Yes, v2
GPS	Yes

            Mitac MIO A502 Key Highlights
            
                  Processor
                  TI OMAP 850
               
                  RAM & Storage
                  64 MB + 64 MB
               
                  Display
                  2.7", 240 x 320 Resolution
               
                  Rear Camera
                  2 MP
               
                  Battery
                  1050 mAh