Karbonn Smart Tab 10 Cosmic is a good device for those who desire the fast and powerful performance and enhanced experience of a dual core processor on a large screen in an economical price range.
Karbonn Smart Tab 10 cosmic sports a 9.7 inch capacitive touch screen with a resolution of 1024 x 768 pixel. It is supported by Android 4.1 Jelly Bean OS and its powered by 1.5 GHZ processor with 1GB of RAM. It has 4GB of internal storage which is expandable upto 32GB via SD card.
It provides 2MP camera at the back for shutterbugs and a VGA front camera for video calling. Karbonn Smart Tab 10 cosmic supports Wii-fi connectivity along with 3G.
Karbonn Smart Tab 10 Cosmic is fueled by 6000mAh battery.
I bought this tablet on december 29th from a shop in chennai.. it has a good look, screen resolution is good for this price... i had some problems while connecting my 3G dongle in this, we cannot see in this tablet whether the datacard is connected or not.. sometimes it connects , sometimes not, based on our luck.. there is no option in the settings to unmount this device.. nthe unbearable part is that it hangs often.. when it hangs, you dont have any other option than waiting for the battery to discharge completely... within one month of its purchase, it hanged for three times..at the third time, i could not restart it.. it was gone fully.. then i gave it to the service center.. after some four five days, they said they cannot repair it, they gave me a fresh tablet... nthe most pathetic thing is that the new fresh tablet couldn't last for even one day :( it hangd again, not able to start it.. n Please dont buy this...
Let me Tell all about the tablet as you can see im only referring to the specifications MENTIONED at flipkart or the official Karbonn website. 1)Look/Feel:Candy Bar,Black 2)Display: a) 9.7"(24.6cm),TFT LCD Resolution: b)1026*768(plz look it up im absolutely sure) Touch: c)10 point Multitouch capacitive 3)User interface: a)Android 4.1.1 Jelly Bean(The major advantage after the processor) Sensors: b)3d G-Sensor,probably an Accelerometer,Motion Sensing(as claimed) Email: c)Instant messaging,GTalk,Gmail,Push Notifications... 4)Connectivity:WiFi 802.11 b/g/n,3G via dongle,USB,HDMI 5)Camera: 2 Front VGA(used for Calling Skype,Tango... not HD) , Rear HD 2mp Primary. 6)Processor: ***1.5 Ghz Dual Core*** ARM Cortex A9 (Now Thats What im talkin bout) 7)GPU: No information really hard to find (This is that decodes HD Video and Games) 8)Memory: a) 1GB RAM (Good for HD gaming,Video Lot of apps,push,launchers,etc..) b)1.5GB internal storage (guess its ROM+apps) c)microSD slot upto 32GB (guess class 10 or 12[upto]) 9)Battery: 6000mAH (now ur guessing thats a lot well not enough for a 10 inch maybe 7) 10)Support: Well Karbonn is better at mentioning more Service centres and Dealers than Micromax (look it up though i have an A110,and a funbook PRO)1 year on Handset and 6 months on Acessories(are u seriously gonna own this phone for more than a year with the competition) Verdict: in a nutshell Better get to know the GPU but its awesome i haven seen a single 10 inch tablet in india with a dual core 10 inch screen other than AINOL HERO(16:9) Price at its best no hard feelings Micromax(u gotta step it up). Well guys gotta go talk bout the A30 now. Chow.
|Operating System||Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)|
|Screen Size||9.7 inches (24.64 cm)|
|Screen Resolution||1024 x 768 pixels|
|Pixel Density||132 ppi|
|Touch Screen||Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen|
|Processor||Dual core, 1.5 GHz, Cortext A9|
|Expandable Memory||Yes, Up to 32 GB|
2 MP, Primary Camera
|Flash||Yes, LED Flash|
|Image Resolution||1600 x 1200 Pixels|
|Shooting Modes||Continuos Shooting|
0.3 MP Primary Camera
|Camera Features||Fixed Focus|
EV-DO category Rev.A
|Wi-Fi||Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n|
10.1 inches vs 9.7 inches
null 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.5 GHz
Lower battery capacity:
5600 mAH vs 6000 mAH
Higher secondary camera resolution:
1.3 MP vs 0.3 MP
Smaller screen :
9 inches vs 9.7 inches
null 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.5 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Higher pixel density:
156 ppi vs 132 ppi
null 1.5 GHz vs Dual core 1.5 GHz