|
|
|
|
can use it as a phone by using your sim,has Bluetooth,wifi,3g. what else you need?
Brand | Mercury |
Model | mTab Neo |
Operating System | Android v2.2 (Froyo) |
SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM |
Network |
5G: Not Supported in India, 3G: Available |
Height | 194 mm |
Width | 117.5 mm |
Thickness | 12.80 mm |
Weight | 250 grams |
Colours | Black |
Screen Size | 7 inches (17.78 cm) |
Screen Resolution | 800 x 480 pixels |
Pixel Density | 133 ppi |
Display Type | LCD |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen |
Screen to Body Ratio | 61.13 % |
Processor | Dual core, 1 GHz |
Internal Memory | 8 GB |
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
Main Camera | ||
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Flash | Yes | |
Image Resolution | 1600 x 1200 Pixels | |
Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Smile detection |
|
Video Recording | 1920x1080 @ 30 | |
Front Camera | ||
Resolution |
0.3 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Camera Features | Fixed Focus |
Capacity | 4000 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G |
SIM 1 |
3G Speed: EV-DO category Rev.A
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Bluetooth | Yes, v3 |
HDMI | Yes |
Other Sensors | Accelerometer |
Larger screen:
10.10 inches (25.65 cm) vs 7.00 inches (17.78 cm)
Faster processor:
Dual core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Larger screen:
10.10 inches (25.65 cm) vs 7.00 inches (17.78 cm)
Has RAM
512 MB
Slower processor:
null 1.0 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Larger screen:
9.40 inches (23.88 cm) vs 7.00 inches (17.78 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.6 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Higher secondary camera resolution:
1.3 MP vs 0.3 MP
Has RAM
512 MB
Slower processor:
null 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Lower battery capacity:
3400 mAH vs 4000 mAH
More thickness:
13 mm vs 12.8 mm
More weight:
365 grams vs 250 grams
Common Features
Lesser thickness:
10.5 mm vs 12.8 mm
Has RAM
512 MB
Slower processor:
null 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Rs 25,990