INFO

SPECS

PHOTOS

COMPETITORS

Mitac MIO 169

+ Compare

View All Photos (2)

Mitac MIO 169 is permanently discontinued.

Key Specs

Performance

64 MB RAM

Display

2.8 inches (7.11 cm); LCD
320x240 px

Battery

1350 mAh

General

5G Not Supported
32 MB internal storage, Expandable upto 2 GB

Add To Compare See Full Specs

Competitors For Mitac MIO 169

View Alternatives

Lava Iris 406q

Discontinued ₹5,299

This Competitor Has

Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 64 MB

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Higher Battery Capacity: 1700 mAH vs 1350 mAH

Mitac MIO 169 VS Lava Iris 406q

Mitac MIO A502

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher Internal Memory: 64 MB vs 32 MB

Lower Weight: 135 grams vs 172 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.7" (6.86 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Mitac MIO 169 VS Mitac MIO A502

Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 mini

Discontinued ₹16,745

This Competitor Has

Higher Internal Memory: 128 MB vs 32 MB

Lower Weight: 88 grams vs 172 grams

Smaller Screen: 2.5" (6.35 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Mitac MIO 169 VS Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 mini

LG KU 990 Viewty

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Larger Screen: 3" (7.62 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Higher Internal Memory: 100 MB vs 32 MB

Lower Weight: 112 grams vs 172 grams

Mitac MIO 169 VS LG KU 990 Viewty

Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Discontinued ₹44,538

This Competitor Has

Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 64 MB

Larger Screen: 4" (10.16 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Better Display: IPS LCD vs LCD

Mitac MIO 169 VS Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Spice QT-56

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Smaller Screen: 2.2" (5.59 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Lower Battery Capacity: 1000 mAH vs 1350 mAH

Mitac MIO 169 VS Spice QT-56

Maxon MX-V30

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Lower Weight: 80 grams vs 172 grams

Mitac MIO 169 VS Maxon MX-V30

Blackberry Touch 9860

Discontinued

This Competitor Has

Higher RAM: 768 MB vs 64 MB

Larger Screen: 3.7" (9.4 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Higher Internal Memory: 4 MB vs 32 MB

Mitac MIO 169 VS Blackberry Touch 9860

Micromax Canvas A1

Discontinued ₹3,999

This Competitor Has

Higher RAM: 1 MB vs 64 MB

Larger Screen: 4.5" (11.43 cm) vs 2.8" (7.11 cm)

Better Display: IPS LCD vs LCD

Mitac MIO 169 VS Micromax Canvas A1

Nokia Asha 500 Dual SIM

Discontinued ₹5,209

This Competitor Has

Higher Internal Memory: 128 MB vs 32 MB

Lower Weight: 101.3 grams vs 172 grams

Standard Display: TFT vs LCD

Mitac MIO 169 VS Nokia Asha 500 Dual SIM

Mitac MIO 169 Specifications

Performance Display Design Battery Storage Network & Connectivity Multimedia Sensors

Performance
RAM	64 MB

Display
Display Type	LCD
Screen Size	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
Resolution	320x240 px
Pixel Density	143 ppi
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)	24.33 %

Design
Height	125.6 mm
Width	79.5 mm
Thickness	24.20 mm
Weight	172 grams

Battery
Capacity	1350 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion
TalkTime	Up to 8(2G)

Storage
Internal Storage	32 MB
Expandable Storage	Yes, Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)	Single SIM
Network Support	5G Not Supported
Wi-Fi	No
Bluetooth	No

Multimedia
Music	Yes, Music Formats: No

Sensors
Java	Yes, MIDP 2.0
Browser	Yes
Phone Book	Yes
SMS	Yes
MMS	Yes
Other Facilities	Alarm, Clock, Calender, Calculator

            Mitac MIO 169 Key Highlights
            
                  RAM & Storage
                  64 MB + 32 MB
               
                  Display
                  2.8", 320 x 240 Resolution
               
                  Battery
                  1350 mAh