|
|
|
|
I purchase this device, it is average, body and look is good but sound is so poor, even earphone is not working, so I decided to write to provider or retailer to change. nI hope after change, i'll get satisfactory device. but yet, it is not a perfect device.nnIt take a little bit more time to change orientation vertical to horizontal. nI don't know why it is slow, but it is a so-so tablet.
I brought the product through other vendor and regret for buying it. They did not send me the product properly packed. When I opened it I did not notice that the back cover was partially opened. Because of this one of my sim card of regular size slipped into the device without realizing it. When I contacted the vendor they laughed it off and said its not possible without applying pressure. But trust me, this product is of very bad physical quality. Its backside looks premium but its not. Its screen is reflective and prone to fingerprints. The product I got contains even cracks. Touch is like resistive and not smooth. Screen is hyper sensitive and rotates often at the slight moment of hand. Placement of front camera is not proper as per my opinion and you cannot handle a video call by holding it with one hand. Sound clarity is poor and while competitors are offering Dolby digital at similar or slightly higher price, this company is not even giving sufficient volume at mono sound. Front camera seems better with auto focus features. Android interface is a raw one and do not expect user interface like that of Samsung or even Micromax in this tablet. I personally feel owning this tablet is totally hopeless as it is not a reliable choice with frequent call drops. Gaming looks slightly better for casual users, and none wants to shell 10K rupees of hard-earned money for an inferior quality product. My honest opinion: if you are a business user, spend another 15% extra and get a branded one, with reliability and quality. Do not worry about lesser mega pixels or lesser number of cores. At the end, what you need as a business user is reliability. That you will not get in this product. If you are a casual user, spending 10K is useless. Instead of it, spend 30% less, do not go for a 3G, and get better Chinese product of reputable quality for a slightly lower premium. Take a wiser decision and do not merely go by reviews alone. Buy product from a trusted company, but not from the one who do not trust customers.
Brand | OPlus |
Model | XonPad 7 |
Operating System | Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) |
SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM, GSM |
Network |
5G: Not Supported in India, 3G: Available, 2G: Available |
Height | 189 mm |
Width | 115 mm |
Thickness | 9.7 mm |
Weight | 310 grams |
Colours | Black |
Screen Size | 7.0 inches (17.78 cm) |
Screen Resolution | 1280 x 800 pixels |
Pixel Density | 216 ppi |
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Screen to Body Ratio | 65.37 % |
Chipset | MediaTek MT8389 |
Processor | 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A7 + Marvell |
RAM | 1 GB |
Internal Memory | 16 GB |
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
Main Camera | ||
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Front Camera | ||
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 3500 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
Voice Calling | Yes |
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 |
GPS | Yes |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Accelerometer |
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
More expandable memory:
64 GB vs 32 GB
Lesser weight:
300 grams vs 310 grams
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.0 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
2 MP vs 5 MP
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Slower processor:
null 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 5 MP
Higher battery capacity:
3950 mAH vs 3500 mAH
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
More expandable memory:
64 GB vs 32 GB
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
Lesser thickness:
9.2 mm vs 9.7 mm
Larger screen:
7.85 inches (19.94 cm) vs 7.00 inches (17.78 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
4000 mAH vs 3500 mAH
Rs 25,990