|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A19
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Apple A19 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 2,250,422 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2500's 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Apple A19 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jun, 2025
|
Sep, 2025
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Hexa Core
(4.26 GHz, Dual Core + 2.6 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Apple A19 GPU
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,515,751
|
2,250,422
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,064/7,609
|
3,672/9,327
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2500
1,515,751
Apple A19
2,250,422
CPU
379,701
797,126
GPU
529,745
787,117
Memory
360,939
291,287
UX
245,366
374,892
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,064
Apple A19
3,672
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,609
Apple A19
9,327
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Apple
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
Apple A19
|
Model No
|
S5E9955
|
T8150a
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Hexa Core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Hexa Core (4.26 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.6 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.4-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
320 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
8 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
16 MB
|
N/A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Apple A19 GPU
|
GPU Clock speed
|
999 MHz
|
1.62 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
8
|
5
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1024
|
640
|
FLOPS
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
2073.6 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
N/A
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
N/A
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
Neural Engine
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
4.8 GHz
|
4.266 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
12 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
NVMe
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
48 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
UHD @ 120 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
N/A
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
UHD @ 120 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP8, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
Snapdragon X80
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 10000 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 3700 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.4
|
6.0
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A18 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G5
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A17 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G4
Apple A19
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Apple A19
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
Apple A19
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Apple A19
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Apple A19
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e