Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor G6

Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 2,471,984 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Google Tensor G6's 1,856,183 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G6

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

Jun, 2025

Aug, 2026

CPU

Deca Core

(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)

Hepta Core

(4.11 GHz, Single Core + 3.38 GHz, Quad core + 2.65 GHz, Dual core)

Process Node

3 nm

2 nm

GPU

Xclipse 950

PowerVR CXTP-48-1536

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

AnTuTu Score

2,471,984

View Benchmark Details

1,856,183

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Score

2,346/7,911

View Benchmark Details

2,653/6,275

View Benchmark Details

Phones Powered by These SoCs

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

Score: 2,471,984

₹79,999

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

Score: 1,801,542

₹186,999

Benchmark

AnTuTu (The higher, the better)

AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios

Samsung Exynos 2500 2,471,984

View Benchmark Details

Google Tensor G6 1,856,183

View Benchmark Details

CPU

779,211

787,209

GPU

975,814

432,623

Memory

269,705

279,128

447,254

357,223

Geekbench (The higher, the better)

The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Geekbench Single Core

Samsung Exynos 2500 2,346

View Benchmark Details

Google Tensor G6 2,653

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Multi Core

Samsung Exynos 2500 7,911

View Benchmark Details

Google Tensor G6 6,275

View Benchmark Details

Benchmark Screenshots

AnTuTu Score:

General

SoC Brand

Samsung

Google

Title

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G6

Model No

S5E9955

N/A

Manufacturing

Samsung

TSMC

CPU

Total Cores

Deca Core

Hepta Core

CPU

Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)

Hepta Core (4.11 GHz, Single Core, C1 Ultra + 3.38 GHz, Quad core, C1 Pro + 2.65 GHz, Dual core, C1 Pro)

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Process Node

3 nm

2 nm

Instruction Set

ARMv9.2-A

ARMv9.3-A

L1 Cache

128 KB

N/A

L2 Cache

3 MB

N/A

L3 Cache

16 MB

8 MB

GPU

Xclipse 950

PowerVR CXTP-48-1536

GPU Clock speed

999 MHz

1.286 GHz

Pipelines

Shading Units

128

Total Shaders

1024

768

FLOPS

4091.9 Gigaflops

1975.2 Gigaflops

Vulkan Version

1.4

OpenCL Version

3.0 FP

DirectX Version

12.1

N/A

Memory

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

Memory Speed

4.8 GHz

N/A

Bus

4x16 Bit

Memory Max bandwidth

76.8 Gb/s

N/A

Memory Max size

24 GB

16 GB

Storage Type

UFS 4.0

UFS 4.1

Camera

Max Camera Sensor Supported

320 MP

200 MP

Max Video Capture Resolution

8K @ 30 FPS

Display

Max On-Device Display Resolution

UHD

3840x2400

Max Refresh Rate

120 Hz

N/A

Multimedia

Video Playback Resolution

8K @ 60 FPS

8K @ 30 FPS

Video Codecs

H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9

H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9

Audio Codecs

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Name

Exynos 5400

N/A

5G Support

Yes

Peak Download Speed

Up to 12100 Mbps

N/A

Peak Upload Speed

Up to 3670 Mbps

N/A

Wi-Fi Version

Wi-Fi Standard

ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

N/A

Bluetooth Version

5.4

6.0

Navigation

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS

User Feedback

Related Comparisons

Samsung Exynos 2500

Samsung Exynos 2600

Samsung Exynos 2500

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite

Samsung Exynos 2500

MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A19 Pro

Samsung Exynos 2500

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

Google Tensor G6

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

Google Tensor G6

Samsung Exynos 2400

Google Tensor G6

MediaTek Dimensity 9300

Google Tensor G6

Apple A18 Pro

Google Tensor G6

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2