|
68%
InFocus Turbo 5 Plus
₹8,199
(Discontinued)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
InFocus Turbo 5 Plus vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the InFocus Turbo 5 Plus vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while InFocus Turbo 5 Plus runs at 1.5 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while InFocus Turbo 5 Plus offers 5.5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both InFocus Turbo 5 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: InFocus Turbo 5 Plus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making InFocus Turbo 5 Plus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both InFocus Turbo 5 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while InFocus Turbo 5 Plus offers 4850 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while InFocus Turbo 5 Plus offers 32 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
InFocus Turbo 5 Plus
₹8,199
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
68%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
21 Sep, 2017
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6750
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.5 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4850 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(3,639 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6750
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T860 MP2
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
70.3 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
154.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
176 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
Frame: Metal
Back: Metal |
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
|
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4850 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Front
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|