|
79%
Infinix Hot 60
₹17,999
|
80%
realme P4x
₹20,524
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Hot 60 vs realme P4x
Comparing the Infinix Hot 60 vs realme P4x across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme P4x runs at a higher processing speed of 2.6 GHz, while Infinix Hot 60 runs at 2.2 GHz, making realme P4x the better performer.
Display: realme P4x offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while Infinix Hot 60 offers 6.7 inches, making realme P4x the larger display of the two. Infinix Hot 60 features a IPS LCD display compared to realme P4x's LCD, making Infinix Hot 60 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Infinix Hot 60 and realme P4x feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Infinix Hot 60 and realme P4x feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: realme P4x offers a higher battery capacity with 7000 mAh, while Infinix Hot 60 offers 5200 mAh, making realme P4x better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Infinix Hot 60 and realme P4x offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: realme P4x receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Infinix Hot 60 is rated 7.8.
User Rating: Infinix Hot 60 and realme P4x both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Infinix Hot 60
₹17,999
@ Amazon
|
✕
realme P4x
₹20,524
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
17 Jul, 2025
|
10 Dec, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7020
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5200 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
45W Super Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.8/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(3,170 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(14,169 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
974,831
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
17h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 17, 2025
(Official)
|
Dec 04, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
2 Year
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7020
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra MT6878T
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
IMG BXM-8-256
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
974,831
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
1,017
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
21.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
700 nits
|
950 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
700 nits
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
262 ppi
|
391 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.01 %
|
86.42 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.95 %
|
91.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
166 mm
|
166 mm
|
Width
|
76.8 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
8.39 mm
|
Weight
|
193 grams
|
208 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Glass Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle 77° field-of-view |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view27 mm focal length 1/2.88" sensor size OV50D 0.61µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera1/5.1" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
3072 x 4096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60/120 fps HD @30/60/120/240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Vlog Mode |
Slow Motion
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
5200 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 49.9 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 45W Super Charging 100% in 90 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
17h 38m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 25m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 2048 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.180 W/kg Body: 0.720 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
Infinix Hot 60
Infinix Hot 60i 5G
Infinix Hot 60
POCO M7 Plus
Infinix Hot 60
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Infinix Hot 60
POCO C85 5G
realme P4x
realme P4R 5G
realme P4x
realme P4
realme P4x
Moto G57 Power
realme P4x
vivo T4X
realme P4x
vivo T5x
realme P4x
OPPO K13 5G
realme P4x
OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
realme P4x
Moto G67 Power
realme P4x
POCO M8
realme P4x
realme P3
realme P4x
Samsung Galaxy M36
realme P4x
realme Narzo 90X
realme P4x
Xiaomi Redmi 15
realme P4x
iQOO Z11x
realme P4x
realme P4 Lite 5G