|
79%
Infinix Hot 60
₹17,499
|
77%
POCO C85 5G
₹15,309
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Hot 60 vs POCO C85 5G
Comparing the Infinix Hot 60 vs POCO C85 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO C85 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while Infinix Hot 60 runs at 2.2 GHz, making POCO C85 5G the better performer.
Display: POCO C85 5G offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while Infinix Hot 60 offers 6.7 inches, making POCO C85 5G the larger display of the two. Both Infinix Hot 60 and POCO C85 5G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Infinix Hot 60 and POCO C85 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Infinix Hot 60 and POCO C85 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO C85 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Infinix Hot 60 offers 5200 mAh, making POCO C85 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Infinix Hot 60 and POCO C85 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Infinix Hot 60 and POCO C85 5G equally at 7.8.
User Rating: Infinix Hot 60 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while POCO C85 5G has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Infinix Hot 60
₹17,499
@ Amazon
|
✕
POCO C85 5G
₹15,309
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
17 Jul, 2025
|
16 Dec, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7020
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5200 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.8/10
|
7.8/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(3,090 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(2,221 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
553,034
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
15h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 17, 2025
(Official)
|
Dec 09, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
2 Year
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7020
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
IMG BXM-8-256
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
553,034
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
13.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
700 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
700 nits
|
810 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
262 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.01 %
|
81.85 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.95 %
|
81.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
166 mm
|
173.16 mm
|
Width
|
76.8 mm
|
81.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
193 grams
|
211 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle 77° field-of-view |
50 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
3072 x 4080 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Voice Shutter |
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Vlog Mode |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5200 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
15h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 7m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.797 W/kg Body: 0.796 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
Infinix Hot 60
Infinix Hot 60i 5G
Infinix Hot 60
POCO M7 Plus
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Plus
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7
POCO C85 5G
POCO C85x
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
POCO C85 5G
realme P4 Lite 5G
POCO C85 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Pro
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
POCO C85 5G
OPPO K14x 5G
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
POCO C85 5G
realme C83 5G
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15
POCO C85 5G
realme P3x
POCO C85 5G
vivo X300 FE