|
71%
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M21
₹14,980
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Hot 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M21
Comparing the Infinix Hot 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M21 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy M21 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,100, while Infinix Hot 9 Pro scores 880, making Samsung Galaxy M21 the better performer.
Display: Infinix Hot 9 Pro offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M21 offers 6.4 inches, making Infinix Hot 9 Pro the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M21 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Infinix Hot 9 Pro's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M21 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Infinix Hot 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M21 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy M21 offers a higher front camera resolution with 20 MP, while Infinix Hot 9 Pro offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M21 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Infinix Hot 9 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 22m, while Samsung Galaxy M21 delivers 10h 20m, making Infinix Hot 9 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Infinix Hot 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M21 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Infinix Hot 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M21 equally at 7.
User Rating: Infinix Hot 9 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy M21 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M21
₹14,980
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
30 Jun, 2020
|
18 Mar, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
20 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(86,637 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(65,210 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
103,704
AnTuTu Score
|
168,633
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
10h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹14,980
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 30, 2020
(Official)
|
Mar 18, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
4 Year
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
103,704
|
168,633
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.9 %
|
11.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
420 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
266 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.99 %
|
84.02 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.5 %
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
165 mm
|
159 mm
|
Width
|
76.8 mm
|
75.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
185 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.026 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera26 mm focal length CMOS |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 30 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 22m
|
10h 20m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 26m 13s
|
2h 9m 47s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.845 W/kg
|
Head: 0.468 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹14,980
|