|
71%
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
realme Narzo 10
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Hot 9 Pro vs realme Narzo 10
Comparing the Infinix Hot 9 Pro vs realme Narzo 10 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 10 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,340, while Infinix Hot 9 Pro scores 880, making realme Narzo 10 the better performer.
Display: Infinix Hot 9 Pro offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while realme Narzo 10 offers 6.5 inches, making Infinix Hot 9 Pro the larger display of the two. Both Infinix Hot 9 Pro and realme Narzo 10 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Infinix Hot 9 Pro and realme Narzo 10 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: realme Narzo 10 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Infinix Hot 9 Pro offers 8 MP, making realme Narzo 10 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Infinix Hot 9 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 22m, while realme Narzo 10 delivers 12h 56m, making Infinix Hot 9 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Infinix Hot 9 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while realme Narzo 10 offers 128 GB, making Infinix Hot 9 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Infinix Hot 9 Pro and realme Narzo 10 equally at 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 10 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Infinix Hot 9 Pro has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 10
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
30 Jun, 2020
|
18 May, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(86,637 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(182,207 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
103,704
AnTuTu Score
|
200,306
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 30, 2020
(Official)
|
May 18, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G52
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
103,704
|
200,306
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.9 %
|
11.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
266 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.99 %
|
82.29 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.5 %
|
89.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
165 mm
|
164.4 mm
|
Width
|
76.8 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
9 mm
|
Weight
|
185 grams
|
199 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.826 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 30 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 22m
|
12h 56m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 26m 13s
|
2h 38m 16s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.845 W/kg
|
Head: 0.857 W/kg Body: 0.609 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|