|
67%
Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus
₹6,199
(Out of Stock)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus runs at 1.3 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus offers 5.2 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus offers 2800 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus offers 32 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
Intex Aqua Lions X1 Plus
₹6,199
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
67%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
24 Nov, 2017
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2800 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(470 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Nov 24, 2017
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T720 MP1
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
282 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.64 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
150 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
74.4 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.0 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
170 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2800 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.313 W/kg Body: 0.396 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|