|
69%
LG W10
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
₹9,623
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
LG W10 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
Comparing the LG W10 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both LG W10 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers a screen size of 6.3 inches, while LG W10 offers 6.19 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro the larger display of the two. Both LG W10 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while LG W10 offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 13 MP, while LG W10 offers 8 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both LG W10 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offer the same 4000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while LG W10 offers 32 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while LG W10 has a rating of 3.6.
|
LG W10
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
₹9,623
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
03 Jul, 2019
|
13 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.19 inches (15.72 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1500 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
13 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(1,796 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(849,198 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
181,423
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 13, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
181,423
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
34.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.19 inches (15.72 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1500 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18.9:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.13 %
|
81.21 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
80 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
156 mm
|
159.2 mm
|
Width
|
76.2 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
164 grams
|
186 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2CMOS image sensor |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraCMOS |
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 01m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 25m 33s
|