|
61%
Lyf Wind 4S
₹4,199
(Out of Stock)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lyf Wind 4S vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Lyf Wind 4S vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Lyf Wind 4S runs at 1.3 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Lyf Wind 4S offers 5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Lyf Wind 4S and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Lyf Wind 4S and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Lyf Wind 4S and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Lyf Wind 4S offers 4000 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Lyf Wind 4S offers 16 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
Lyf Wind 4S
₹4,199
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
61%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
17 Oct, 2016
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 210
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(788 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 17, 2016
(Official)
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 304
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.09 %
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
144.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
73 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
148 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera6x Digital Zoom |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
6 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 34 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.1
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
N/A
|