|
74%
Moto G10 Power
₹14,900
|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power
₹13,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G10 Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power
Comparing the Moto G10 Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,409, while Moto G10 Power scores 1,126, making Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while Moto G10 Power offers 6.5 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power the larger display of the two. Both Moto G10 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Moto G10 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Moto G10 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto G10 Power delivers longer battery life with 25h 23m, while Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power delivers 23h 18m, making Moto G10 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G10 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Moto G10 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power equally at 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G10 Power has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Moto G10 Power
₹14,900
@ Amazon
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power
₹13,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
16 Mar, 2021
|
22 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 460
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(62,517 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(362,211 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
144,364
AnTuTu Score
|
177,786
AnTuTu Score
|
|
25h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
23h 18m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹14,900
|
₹13,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 16, 2021
(Official)
|
Dec 22, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
144,364
|
177,786
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
26.5 %
|
17.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.57 %
|
83.25 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
85 %
|
90.34 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.2 mm
|
162.3 mm
|
Width
|
75.7 mm
|
77.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
200 grams
|
198 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Movie Frame
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera27 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 45 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
25h 23m
|
23h 18m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 30m 9s
|
2h 46m 52s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.01 W/kg Body: 1.43 W/kg
|
Head: 0.868 W/kg Body: 0.865 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
₹14,900
|
₹13,999
|