|
73%
Moto G22
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
74%
realme Narzo 50A
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G22 vs realme Narzo 50A
Comparing the Moto G22 vs realme Narzo 50A across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 50A scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,344, while Moto G22 scores 946, making realme Narzo 50A the better performer.
Display: Both Moto G22 and realme Narzo 50A offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Moto G22 and realme Narzo 50A feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G22 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while realme Narzo 50A offers 8 MP, making Moto G22 better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme Narzo 50A delivers longer battery life with 17h 53m, while Moto G22 delivers 15h 58m, making realme Narzo 50A the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G22 and realme Narzo 50A offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme Narzo 50A receives a higher expert rating of 7.5 from the editorial team, while Moto G22 is rated 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 50A receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Moto G22 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Moto G22
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 50A
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
15 Jun, 2022
|
24 Sep, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G37
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(35,814 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(390,810 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
114,996
AnTuTu Score
|
218,890
AnTuTu Score
|
|
15h 58m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 53m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 15, 2022
(Official)
|
Sep 24, 2021
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G37
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
114,996
|
218,890
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
50.0 s
|
32.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
2.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
19.5 %
|
44.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
570 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.09 %
|
81.7 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89 %
|
88.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.9 mm
|
164.5 mm
|
Width
|
74.9 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
185 grams
|
207 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 77° field-of-view26.79 mm focal length 1/2.7" sensor size S5KJN1 ISO-CELL |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera21.9 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera21.9 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 58m
|
17h 53m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 52m 52s
|
2h 34m 24s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.18 W/kg Body: 1.44 W/kg
|
Head: 0.983 W/kg Body: 0.554 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|