|
76%
Moto G8 Plus
₹7,990
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
realme 5i
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G8 Plus vs realme 5i
Comparing the Moto G8 Plus vs realme 5i across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme 5i scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,371, while Moto G8 Plus scores 1,303, making realme 5i the better performer.
Display: realme 5i offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Moto G8 Plus offers 6.3 inches, making realme 5i the larger display of the two. Both Moto G8 Plus and realme 5i feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G8 Plus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while realme 5i offers 12 MP, making Moto G8 Plus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G8 Plus offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while realme 5i offers 8 MP, making Moto G8 Plus better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme 5i delivers longer battery life with 16h 24m, while Moto G8 Plus delivers 12h 33m, making realme 5i the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G8 Plus and realme 5i offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme 5i receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Moto G8 Plus is rated 7.
User Rating: realme 5i receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Moto G8 Plus has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Moto G8 Plus
₹7,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme 5i
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
29 Oct, 2019
|
15 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2280 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Turbo Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(11,317 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(413,632 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
167,968
AnTuTu Score
|
172,716
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 33m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 24m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 29, 2019
(Official)
|
Jan 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
167,968
|
172,716
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
23.8 %
|
16.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2280 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
400 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.1 %
|
82.73 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
89 %
|
Design
Height
|
158.4 mm
|
164.4 mm
|
Width
|
75.8 mm
|
75 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.0 mm
|
9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.0CMOS image sensor 1.6µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.81/2.8" sensor size IMX386 CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
|
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraCMOS 1.8µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 34.4 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Turbo Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 33m
|
16h 24m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 11s
|
2h 44m 7s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.180 W/kg Body: 0.631 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|