|
76%
Motorola One Vision
₹11,987
(Out of Stock)
|
72%
OPPO Reno 2Z
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Motorola One Vision vs OPPO Reno 2Z
Comparing the Motorola One Vision vs OPPO Reno 2Z across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Vision scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,333, while OPPO Reno 2Z scores 1,489, making Motorola One Vision the better performer.
Display: OPPO Reno 2Z offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Motorola One Vision offers 6.3 inches, making OPPO Reno 2Z the larger display of the two. OPPO Reno 2Z features a AMOLED display compared to Motorola One Vision's IPS LCD, making OPPO Reno 2Z the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Motorola One Vision and OPPO Reno 2Z feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Motorola One Vision offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while OPPO Reno 2Z offers 16 MP, making Motorola One Vision better for front camera photography.
Battery: Motorola One Vision delivers longer battery life with 12h 20m, while OPPO Reno 2Z delivers 8h 07m, making Motorola One Vision the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: OPPO Reno 2Z offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Motorola One Vision offers 128 GB, making OPPO Reno 2Z the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Motorola One Vision receives a higher expert rating of 7 from the editorial team, while OPPO Reno 2Z is rated 6.
User Rating: OPPO Reno 2Z receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Motorola One Vision has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Motorola One Vision
₹11,987
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO Reno 2Z
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
27 Jun, 2019
|
06 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
MediaTek Helio P90
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
15W Turbo Power Charging
|
VOOC Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
6.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(12,076 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(8,503 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
149,177
AnTuTu Score
|
217,093
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
8h 07m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 27, 2019
(Official)
|
Sep 06, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
MediaTek Helio P90
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
149,177
|
217,093
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
17.0 s
|
21.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
16.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
21:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
435 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.52 %
|
84.38 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.1 %
|
Design
Height
|
160.1 mm
|
161.8 mm
|
Width
|
71.2 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.74.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.41.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera0.9µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes VOOC Charging v3.0 51% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 20m
|
8h 07m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 5m 3s
|
1h 13m 1s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.183 W/kg Body: 0.780 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|