|
76%
Motorola One Vision
₹18,999
@Amazon
|
80%
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Motorola One Vision vs vivo T4X
Comparing the Motorola One Vision vs vivo T4X across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Vision scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,333, while vivo T4X scores 2,827, making Motorola One Vision the better performer.
Display: vivo T4X offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while Motorola One Vision offers 6.3 inches, making vivo T4X the larger display of the two. Motorola One Vision features a IPS LCD display compared to vivo T4X's LCD, making Motorola One Vision the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo T4X offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Motorola One Vision offers 48 MP, making vivo T4X better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Motorola One Vision offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while vivo T4X offers 8 MP, making Motorola One Vision better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo T4X delivers longer battery life with 14h 11m, while Motorola One Vision delivers 12h 20m, making vivo T4X the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Motorola One Vision and vivo T4X offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: vivo T4X receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Motorola One Vision is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo T4X receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Motorola One Vision has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Motorola One Vision
₹18,999
@ Amazon
|
✕
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
27 Jun, 2019
|
12 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
|
15W Turbo Power Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(12,076 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(177,939 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
149,177
AnTuTu Score
|
685,052
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
@ Amazon
|
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 27, 2019
(Official)
|
Mar 12, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
149,177
|
685,052
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
17.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
24.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
1050 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1050 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
21:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
435 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.52 %
|
86.24 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
160.1 mm
|
165.70 mm
|
Width
|
71.2 mm
|
76.30 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.09 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
204 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera0.9µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.05 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 20m
|
14h 11m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 5m 3s
|
1h 7m 40s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.985 W/kg Body: 0.936 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
@ Amazon
|
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|