|
76%
Motorola One Vision
₹11,987
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Motorola One Vision vs vivo Z1 Pro
Comparing the Motorola One Vision vs vivo Z1 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Vision scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,333, while vivo Z1 Pro scores 3,262, making Motorola One Vision the better performer.
Display: vivo Z1 Pro offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while Motorola One Vision offers 6.3 inches, making vivo Z1 Pro the larger display of the two. Both Motorola One Vision and vivo Z1 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Motorola One Vision offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while vivo Z1 Pro offers 16 MP, making Motorola One Vision better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Motorola One Vision offers 25 MP, making vivo Z1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Motorola One Vision offers 3500 mAh, making vivo Z1 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: vivo Z1 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola One Vision offers 128 GB, making vivo Z1 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Motorola One Vision is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Motorola One Vision has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Motorola One Vision
₹11,987
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
27 Jun, 2019
|
03 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Snapdragon 712
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Turbo Power Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(12,076 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(360,568 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
149,177
AnTuTu Score
|
109,750
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 27, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 03, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 616
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
149,177
|
109,750
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
17.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
19.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
21:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
435 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.52 %
|
83.17 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.77 %
|
Design
Height
|
160.1 mm
|
162.39 mm
|
Width
|
71.2 mm
|
77.33 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.85 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
201 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera0.9µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 20m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 5m 3s
|
1h 49m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.752 W/kg Body: 0.402 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|