|
78%
OPPO R17 Pro
₹49,990
(Discontinued)
|
77%
vivo V15 Pro
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO R17 Pro vs vivo V15 Pro
Comparing the OPPO R17 Pro vs vivo V15 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO R17 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.2 GHz, while vivo V15 Pro runs at 2.0 GHz, making OPPO R17 Pro the better performer.
Display: OPPO R17 Pro offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo V15 Pro offers 6.39 inches, making OPPO R17 Pro the larger display of the two. vivo V15 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO R17 Pro's AMOLED, making vivo V15 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo V15 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while OPPO R17 Pro offers 12 MP, making vivo V15 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo V15 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO R17 Pro offers 25 MP, making vivo V15 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both OPPO R17 Pro and vivo V15 Pro offer the same 3700 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both OPPO R17 Pro and vivo V15 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: vivo V15 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO R17 Pro is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo V15 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO R17 Pro has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
OPPO R17 Pro
₹49,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
vivo V15 Pro
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
04 Dec, 2018
|
06 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 710
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
20 MP
Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3700 mAh
|
3700 mAh
|
|
Super VOOC Charging
|
Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(652 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(40,521 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
181,420
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 06, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 616
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
181,420
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
17.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.34 %
|
85.17 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v6
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.5 %
|
91.64 %
|
Design
Height
|
157.6 mm
|
157.2 mm
|
Width
|
74.6 mm
|
74.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
183 grams
|
185 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.5 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.55" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.4µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size ISO-CELL 0.8µm pixel size |
|
20 MP
f/2.6 |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
|
N/A
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @60 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraExmor RS |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3700 mAh
|
3700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Super VOOC Charging
|
Yes Fast Charging 24% in 15 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 20m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 43m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.390 W/kg Body: 0.535 W/kg
|
Head: 1.155 W/kg Body: 0.284 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
Newspoint Amazon Paytm UC Browser WPS Office
|