|
69%
POCO C3 64GB
₹8,499
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
realme Narzo 30A 64GB
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C3 64GB vs realme Narzo 30A 64GB
Comparing the POCO C3 64GB vs realme Narzo 30A 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 30A 64GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,285, while POCO C3 64GB scores 523, making realme Narzo 30A 64GB the better performer.
Display: POCO C3 64GB offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while realme Narzo 30A 64GB offers 6.5 inches, making POCO C3 64GB the larger display of the two. Both POCO C3 64GB and realme Narzo 30A 64GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO C3 64GB and realme Narzo 30A 64GB feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: realme Narzo 30A 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while POCO C3 64GB offers 5 MP, making realme Narzo 30A 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: POCO C3 64GB delivers longer battery life with 18h 46m, while realme Narzo 30A 64GB delivers 15h 33m, making POCO C3 64GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO C3 64GB and realme Narzo 30A 64GB offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme Narzo 30A 64GB receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while POCO C3 64GB is rated 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 30A 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while POCO C3 64GB has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
POCO C3 64GB
₹8,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 30A 64GB
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
16 Oct, 2020
|
24 Feb, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G35
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(309,618 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(138,610 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
18h 46m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 33m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
202,855
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 16, 2020
(Official)
|
Feb 24, 2021
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G35
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
202,855
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
37.0 s
|
36.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.3 %
|
45.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
570 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.08 %
|
81.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
88.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.9 mm
|
164.5 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
194 grams
|
207 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle28 mm focal length 1µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.2 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view25.5 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera21.8 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 37 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 46m
|
15h 33m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 45m 1s
|
2h 53m 13s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.506 W/kg Body: 0.833 W/kg
|
Head: 1.366 W/kg Body: 1.104 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|