|
77%
POCO C85 5G
₹15,739
@Amazon
|
77%
POCO M8x 5G
₹19,689
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C85 5G vs POCO M8x 5G
Comparing the POCO C85 5G vs POCO M8x 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M8x 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,112, while POCO C85 5G scores 1,947, making POCO M8x 5G the better performer.
Display: Both POCO C85 5G and POCO M8x 5G offer the same screen size of 6.9 inches, but POCO C85 5G features a IPS LCD display compared to POCO M8x 5G's LCD, making POCO C85 5G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both POCO C85 5G and POCO M8x 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both POCO C85 5G and POCO M8x 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO M8x 5G delivers longer battery life with 22h 19m, while POCO C85 5G delivers 15h 19m, making POCO M8x 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO C85 5G and POCO M8x 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: POCO M8x 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while POCO C85 5G is rated 7.8.
User Rating: POCO C85 5G receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while POCO M8x 5G has a rating of 3.1.
|
✕
POCO C85 5G
₹15,739
@ Amazon
|
✕
POCO M8x 5G
₹19,689
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
16 Dec, 2025
|
21 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
| Dimensity 6300 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
7900 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.8/10
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(2,662 ratings)
|
3.1/5
(154 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
553,034
AnTuTu Score
|
653,645
AnTuTu Score
|
|
15h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
22h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹15,739
@ Amazon
|
₹19,689
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 09, 2025
(Official)
|
Aug 21, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
4 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Year
|
Custom UI
|
HyperOS
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
553,034
|
653,645
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
28.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
401
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
13.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
800 nits
|
675 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
810 nits
|
825 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
240 Hz
|
240 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
254 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.85 %
|
86.15 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
81.8 %
|
86.2 %
|
Design
Height
|
173.16 mm
|
170.12 mm
|
Width
|
81.1 mm
|
78.43 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
211 grams
|
232 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Leather Polycarbonate
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.827 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3072 x 4080 Pixels
|
6144 x 8192 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Voice Shutter |
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.05 Primary Camera25 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
7900 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
N/A
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
Yes 10W Reverse Charging
|
Yes 22.5W Reverse Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 19m
|
22h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 7m
|
1h 12m 6s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.797 W/kg Body: 0.796 W/kg
|
Head: 0.823 W/kg Body: 0.666 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
IR Blaster
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Capacitive
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
₹15,739
@ Amazon
|
₹19,689
@ Amazon
|
Related Comparisons
POCO C85 5G
POCO C85x
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Plus
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7
POCO C85 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Pro
POCO C85 5G
realme P4 Lite 5G
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15
POCO C85 5G
realme Narzo 100 Lite 5G
POCO C85 5G
Moto G37 5G
POCO C85 5G
Infinix Hot 60
POCO C85 5G
vivo X300 FE
POCO M8x 5G
POCO M8 Power 5G
POCO M8x 5G
POCO M8
POCO M8x 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G
POCO M8x 5G
POCO M7 Plus
POCO M8x 5G
POCO X7 Pro
POCO M8x 5G
Moto G57 Power
POCO M8x 5G
realme P4x
POCO M8x 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G
POCO M8x 5G
POCO X7
POCO M8x 5G
realme P4R 5G
POCO M8x 5G
realme P3
POCO M8x 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
POCO M8x 5G
Moto G67 Power
POCO M8x 5G
OPPO K13 5G
POCO M8x 5G
iQOO Z11 Lite 5G