|
77%
POCO C85 5G
₹15,381
|
75%
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
₹14,499
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C85 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Comparing the POCO C85 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO C85 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G runs at 2.2 GHz, making POCO C85 5G the better performer.
Display: Both POCO C85 5G and Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G offer the same screen size of 6.9 inches, but POCO C85 5G features a IPS LCD display compared to Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G's LCD, making POCO C85 5G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO C85 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G offers 32 MP, making POCO C85 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO C85 5G and Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6300 mAh, while POCO C85 5G offers 6000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while POCO C85 5G offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G the better option for storage.
User Rating: POCO C85 5G and Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G both receive the same user rating of 3.8.
|
POCO C85 5G
₹15,381
@ Amazon
|
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
₹14,499
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
16 Dec, 2025
|
15 Apr, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Unisoc T8300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
900x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
32 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6300 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
15W
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.8/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(2,202 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(3,573 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
553,034
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
15h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 09, 2025
(Official)
|
Apr 13, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
4 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Year
|
Custom UI
|
HyperOS
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Unisoc T8300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
553,034
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
13.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
900x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
800 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
810 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
254 ppi
|
266 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.85 %
|
96.04 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
81.8 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
173.16 mm
|
171.56 mm
|
Width
|
81.1 mm
|
79.47 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.15 mm
|
Weight
|
211 grams
|
210 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
32 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3072 x 4080 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Voice Shutter |
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30/60 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6300 mAh
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Yes 15W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 19m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 7m 0s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.797 W/kg Body: 0.796 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
IR Blaster
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Compass
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Plus
POCO C85 5G
POCO C85x
POCO C85 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7
POCO C85 5G
realme P4 Lite 5G
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Pro
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
POCO C85 5G
Infinix Hot 60
POCO C85 5G
vivo X300 FE
POCO C85 5G
realme Narzo 100 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 13 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
POCO M7 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
POCO M7
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
realme P4x
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Lava Bold N2 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
OPPO K14x 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
vivo X300 FE
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
OPPO K13x 5G