|
78%
POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM vs realme Narzo 20 Pro
Comparing the POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM vs realme Narzo 20 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,807, while realme Narzo 20 Pro scores 1,633, making POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM the better performer.
Display: POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 6.5 inches, making POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM the larger display of the two. Both POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 4500 mAh, making POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM and realme Narzo 20 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while realme Narzo 20 Pro is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM and realme Narzo 20 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
POCO M2 Pro 6GB RAM
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
14 Jul, 2020
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
65W Super Dart Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(354,116 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(112,162 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
276,927
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
18h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 14, 2020
(Official)
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
276,927
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.62 %
|
83.36 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.5 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.7 mm
|
162.3 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
209 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7926 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.826 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Macro Video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.5 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
16 MP
f/2.1 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 65W Super Dart Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 37m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 49m 19s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.914 W/kg Body: 0.669 W/kg
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.934 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|