|
77%
POCO M2 Pro
₹13,999
(Out of Stock)
|
74%
OPPO A52 4GB RAM
₹13,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M2 Pro vs OPPO A52 4GB RAM
Comparing the POCO M2 Pro vs OPPO A52 4GB RAM across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M2 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,807, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM scores 1,344, making POCO M2 Pro the better performer.
Display: POCO M2 Pro offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM offers 6.5 inches, making POCO M2 Pro the larger display of the two. Both POCO M2 Pro and OPPO A52 4GB RAM feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: POCO M2 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM offers 12 MP, making POCO M2 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro and OPPO A52 4GB RAM feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO M2 Pro delivers longer battery life with 18h 37m, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM delivers 17h 39m, making POCO M2 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO M2 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM offers 128 GB, making POCO M2 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO M2 Pro and OPPO A52 4GB RAM both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
POCO M2 Pro
₹13,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO A52 4GB RAM
₹13,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
14 Jul, 2020
|
21 Jun, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(250,224 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(51,568 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
276,927
AnTuTu Score
|
182,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 14, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
276,927
|
182,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
37.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.4 %
|
9.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.62 %
|
83.4 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.5 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.7 mm
|
162 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
209 grams
|
192 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7926 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.84.05 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.64 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Video Recording Features
|
Macro Video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.5 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 37m
|
17h 39m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 49m 19s
|
2h 31m 39s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.914 W/kg Body: 0.669 W/kg
|
Head: 1.42 W/kg Body: 1.12 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|