|
77%
POCO M2 Pro
₹16,990
|
72%
Tecno Pova 128GB
₹12,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M2 Pro vs Tecno Pova 128GB
Comparing the POCO M2 Pro vs Tecno Pova 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M2 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,807, while Tecno Pova 128GB scores 1,362, making POCO M2 Pro the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova 128GB offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while POCO M2 Pro offers 6.67 inches, making Tecno Pova 128GB the larger display of the two. Both POCO M2 Pro and Tecno Pova 128GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: POCO M2 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Tecno Pova 128GB offers 16 MP, making POCO M2 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: POCO M2 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Tecno Pova 128GB offers 8 MP, making POCO M2 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Tecno Pova 128GB delivers longer battery life with 20h 32m, while POCO M2 Pro delivers 18h 37m, making Tecno Pova 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO M2 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Tecno Pova 128GB offers 128 GB, making POCO M2 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Tecno Pova 128GB is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Tecno Pova 128GB has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
POCO M2 Pro
₹16,990
@ Flipkart
|
✕
Tecno Pova 128GB
₹12,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
14 Jul, 2020
|
11 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
18W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(250,224 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(2,283 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
276,927
AnTuTu Score
|
195,498
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
20h 32m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,990
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 14, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 11, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
276,927
|
195,498
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.4 %
|
56.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.62 %
|
82.88 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.7 mm
|
171.2 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
209 grams
|
215.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7926 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.85 |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Video Recording Features
|
Macro Video
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.5 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 18W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 37m
|
20h 32m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 49m 19s
|
2h 2m 48s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.914 W/kg Body: 0.669 W/kg
|
Head: 1.039 W/kg Body: 1.145 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,990
|
Not Available in any store
|