|
76%
POCO M3 Pro 5G
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
vivo T1 44W
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M3 Pro 5G vs vivo T1 44W
Comparing the POCO M3 Pro 5G vs vivo T1 44W across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M3 Pro 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,746, while vivo T1 44W scores 1,550, making POCO M3 Pro 5G the better performer.
Display: POCO M3 Pro 5G offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while vivo T1 44W offers 6.44 inches, making POCO M3 Pro 5G the larger display of the two. vivo T1 44W features a AMOLED display compared to POCO M3 Pro 5G's IPS LCD, making vivo T1 44W the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo T1 44W offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while POCO M3 Pro 5G offers 48 MP, making vivo T1 44W better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo T1 44W offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while POCO M3 Pro 5G offers 8 MP, making vivo T1 44W better for front camera photography.
Battery: POCO M3 Pro 5G delivers longer battery life with 21h 39m, while vivo T1 44W delivers 18h 16m, making POCO M3 Pro 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO M3 Pro 5G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo T1 44W offers 128 GB, making POCO M3 Pro 5G the better option for storage.
Expert Review: vivo T1 44W receives a higher expert rating of 7.5 from the editorial team, while POCO M3 Pro 5G is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo T1 44W receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while POCO M3 Pro 5G has a rating of 4.3.
|
POCO M3 Pro 5G
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
vivo T1 44W
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
08 Jun, 2021
|
05 May, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 700
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(65,163 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(115,562 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
259,120
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
21h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 08, 2021
(Official)
|
May 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
259,120
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
18.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
9.3 %
|
6.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
500 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.72 %
|
84.49 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.12 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.8 mm
|
160.8 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
73.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
190 grams
|
182 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.79 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view1/2" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
21h 39m
|
18h 16m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 30m 53s
|
1h 5m 33s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.863 W/kg Body: 0.802 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|