Phicomm Energy 653
₹5,155
(Discontinued)
|
Celkon Q4G
₹4,994
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Phicomm Energy 653 vs Celkon Q4G
Comparing the Phicomm Energy 653 vs Celkon Q4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Phicomm Energy 653 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.1 GHz, while Celkon Q4G runs at 1.0 GHz, making Phicomm Energy 653 the better performer.
Display: Phicomm Energy 653 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Celkon Q4G offers 4.5 inches, making Phicomm Energy 653 the larger display of the two. Both Phicomm Energy 653 and Celkon Q4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Phicomm Energy 653 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Celkon Q4G offers 5 MP, making Phicomm Energy 653 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Phicomm Energy 653 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Celkon Q4G offers 1.3 MP, making Phicomm Energy 653 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Phicomm Energy 653 offers a higher battery capacity with 2230 mAh, while Celkon Q4G offers 1800 mAh, making Phicomm Energy 653 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Phicomm Energy 653 and Celkon Q4G offer the same internal storage of 8 GB.
User Rating: Phicomm Energy 653 receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Celkon Q4G has a rating of 1.
|
✕
Phicomm Energy 653
₹5,155
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Celkon Q4G
₹4,994
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
10 Aug, 2015
|
25 Apr, 2016
|
Performance
|
Snapdragon 210
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
2 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
2230 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(1,790 ratings)
|
1/5
(1 rating)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1 GHz
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 304
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
DDR3
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.33 %
|
62.04 %
|
Design
Height
|
144 mm
|
134 mm
|
Width
|
70 mm
|
67 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.0 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
125 grams
|
129.4 grams
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.4 |
5 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Battery
Capacity
|
2230 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|