|
77%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
₹18,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs OPPO F19s
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs OPPO F19s across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy A22 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,735, while OPPO F19s scores 1,295, making Samsung Galaxy A22 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A22 5G offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while OPPO F19s offers 6.43 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A22 5G the larger display of the two. OPPO F19s features a AMOLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's TFT, making OPPO F19s the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and OPPO F19s feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: OPPO F19s offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G offers 8 MP, making OPPO F19s better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and OPPO F19s offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and OPPO F19s offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and OPPO F19s equally at 7.
User Rating: OPPO F19s receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
₹18,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
23 Jul, 2021
|
27 Sep, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 700
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
33W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(4,552 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(12,432 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
201,317
AnTuTu Score
|
209,839
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 03m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
₹29,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 23, 2021
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
OS Updates
|
2 Year
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
3 Year
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
201,317
|
209,839
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
32.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
8.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.5 %
|
11.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
400 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.33 %
|
84.42 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
167.2 mm
|
160.31 mm
|
Width
|
76.4 mm
|
73.76 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
7.95 mm
|
Weight
|
203 grams
|
175 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.7 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view4.71 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
QWXGA 2K @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.48 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 03m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
3h 21m 37s
|
1h 4m 54s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N78 / N79 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.47 W/kg
|
Head: 0.92 W/kg Body: 0.84 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
₹29,999
|