|
80%
Samsung Galaxy A71
₹29,501
(Out of Stock)
|
81%
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A71 vs vivo X50
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A71 vs vivo X50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo X50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,780, while Samsung Galaxy A71 scores 1,746, making vivo X50 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while vivo X50 offers 6.56 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A71 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a Super AMOLED Plus display compared to vivo X50's AMOLED, making Samsung Galaxy A71 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while vivo X50 offers 48 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A71 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo X50 feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a higher battery capacity with 4500 mAh, while vivo X50 offers 4200 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy A71 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo X50 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo X50 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A71 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while vivo X50 has a rating of 4.3.
|
Samsung Galaxy A71
₹29,501
(Out of Stock)
|
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
80%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
24 Feb, 2020
|
24 Jul, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 730
|
Snapdragon 730
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
12 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
13 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4200 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
33W Flash Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(8,844 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(2,567 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
266,827
AnTuTu Score
|
281,854
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 24, 2020
(Official)
|
Jul 24, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
266,827
|
281,854
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
10.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
393 ppi
|
398 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
87.17 %
|
86.51 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
92.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.6 mm
|
159.5 mm
|
Width
|
76 mm
|
75.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
7.5 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
173 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.826 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera20x Digital Zoomf/1.6 Wide AngleIMX598 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor |
|
12 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
13 MP
f/2.46 Depth Camera50 mm focal length |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.48 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
20 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Soft light flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 42 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging v2.0
|
Battery Test Results
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 1s
|
1h 17m 32s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.836 W/kg
|
Head: 1.24 W/kg Body: 0.39 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|