|
72%
Samsung Galaxy F13
₹10,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy F13 vs Moto G42
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F13 vs Moto G42 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G42 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,528, while Samsung Galaxy F13 scores 584, making Moto G42 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F13 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while Moto G42 offers 6.4 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F13 the larger display of the two. Moto G42 features a AMOLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy F13's PLS LCD, making Moto G42 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy F13 and Moto G42 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G42 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F13 offers 8 MP, making Moto G42 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G42 delivers longer battery life with 18h 27m, while Samsung Galaxy F13 delivers 16h 14m, making Moto G42 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy F13 and Moto G42 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy F13 and Moto G42 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F13 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G42 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F13
₹10,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
29 Jun, 2022
|
11 Jul, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 850
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
PLS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(205,572 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(12,785 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
135,739
AnTuTu Score
|
243,481
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹10,999
|
₹12,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 29, 2022
(Official)
|
Jul 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 850
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
135,739
|
243,481
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
40.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
19.5 %
|
16.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
PLS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
400 ppi
|
411 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.68 %
|
83.89 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.4 mm
|
160.6 mm
|
Width
|
76.9 mm
|
73.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.3 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
207 grams
|
174.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 14m
|
18h 27m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 58m 9s
|
2h 8m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.02 W/kg Body: 1.2 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹10,999
|
₹12,999
|