|
72%
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
₹11,499
(Discontinued)
|
71%
Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB
₹13,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB vs Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB vs Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 4,226, while Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB scores 4,110, making Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB offers a screen size of 6.3 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB offers 6.26 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB's TFT, making Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB offers 8 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB delivers longer battery life with 19h 11m, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB delivers 15h 38m, making Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB and Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB is rated 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
₹11,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Y3 64GB
₹13,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
05 Feb, 2019
|
24 Apr, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904
|
Snapdragon 632
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.26 inches (15.9 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(107,017 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(57,944 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
108,577
AnTuTu Score
|
104,342
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Apr 24, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 250 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 250 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
14 nm
|
14 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G71 MP2
|
Adreno 506
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR3
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
108,577
|
104,342
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.26 inches (15.9 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.44 %
|
81.23 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
86.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
156.4 mm
|
158.7 mm
|
Width
|
74.5 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
186 grams
|
180 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/2.8" sensor size S5K3L6 ISO-CELL 1.12µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/2.9" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length 1/6" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
32 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 29 Hours(3G)
|
Up to 51.5 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 11m
|
15h 38m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 19m 29s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.273 W/kg
|
Head: 1.031 W/kg Body: 0.573 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
|