|
65%
TCL Ion X
₹8,990
(Not Released in India)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
TCL Ion X vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the TCL Ion X vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: TCL Ion X runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at 1.82 GHz, making TCL Ion X the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while TCL Ion X offers 6 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both TCL Ion X and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: TCL Ion X offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making TCL Ion X better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both TCL Ion X and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while TCL Ion X offers 3000 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while TCL Ion X offers 32 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
TCL Ion X
₹8,990
(Not Released in India)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
65%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
27 Apr, 2023
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1440 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1440 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
78.94 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
156.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
177.4 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera Wide Angle1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|