|
72%
Tecno Pova
₹10,449
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power
₹13,999
@Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Pova vs Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power
Comparing the Tecno Pova vs Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,409, while Tecno Pova scores 1,362, making Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power offers 6.53 inches, making Tecno Pova the larger display of the two. Both Tecno Pova and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Tecno Pova offers 16 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Tecno Pova and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power delivers longer battery life with 23h 18m, while Tecno Pova delivers 20h 32m, making Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Tecno Pova and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Tecno Pova and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power equally at 7.
User Rating: Tecno Pova and Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Tecno Pova
₹10,449
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power
₹13,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
11 Dec, 2020
|
22 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Flash Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(10,899 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(362,211 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
195,498
AnTuTu Score
|
177,786
AnTuTu Score
|
|
20h 32m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
23h 18m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Flipkart
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 11, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 22, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
195,498
|
177,786
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
56.7 %
|
17.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
263 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.88 %
|
83.25 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.4 %
|
90.34 %
|
Design
Height
|
171.2 mm
|
162.3 mm
|
Width
|
77.5 mm
|
77.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
215.5 grams
|
198 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.85 |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Movie Frame
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera27 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 45 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Flash Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
20h 32m
|
23h 18m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 2m 48s
|
2h 46m 52s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.039 W/kg Body: 1.145 W/kg
|
Head: 0.868 W/kg Body: 0.865 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Flipkart
|