|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
₹16,442
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs POCO C71
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs POCO C71 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 14C runs at a higher processing speed of 2.2 GHz, while POCO C71 runs at 1.8 GHz, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the better performer.
Display: Both Xiaomi Redmi 14C and POCO C71 offer the same screen size of 6.88 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while POCO C71 offers 32 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 14C and POCO C71 feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 14C delivers longer battery life with 14h 23m, while POCO C71 delivers 13h 41m, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi 14C and POCO C71 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi 14C receives a higher expert rating of 7.7 from the editorial team, while POCO C71 is rated 7.5.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi 14C receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while POCO C71 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
₹16,442
@ Flipkart
|
✕
POCO C71
₹8,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
10 Jan, 2025
|
08 Apr, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
Unisoc T7250
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5160 mAh
|
5200 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.7/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(10,190 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(65,102 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
438,871
AnTuTu Score
|
265,154
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 41m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,442
|
₹8,999
|
Compare in 360 View
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 10, 2025
(Official)
|
Apr 08, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v14
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
4 Years
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
HyperOS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 1.95 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 613
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
438,871
|
265,154
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
8.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
34.3 %
|
40.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
600 nits
|
600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
600 nits
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.18 %
|
84.23 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
171.88 mm
|
171.79 mm
|
Width
|
77.8 mm
|
77.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.22 mm
|
8.26 mm
|
Weight
|
205 grams
|
193 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle |
32 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
6500 x 4920 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Film Camera |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Filters Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5160 mAh
|
5200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
N/A
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 23m
|
13h 41m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 23m 45s
|
2h 0m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.818 W/kg Body: 0.770 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,442
|
₹8,999
|
Related Comparisons
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi A4
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
POCO M7
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 13 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
POCO C75
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
vivo X300 FE
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Moto G06 Power
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Itel Zeno 100
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
iQOO Neo 10R
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Samsung Galaxy A07
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
POCO C71
Xiaomi Redmi A5
POCO C71
POCO C75
POCO C71
Samsung Galaxy M07 4G
POCO C71
realme C71
POCO C71
Ai+ Pulse
POCO C71
Moto G06 Power
POCO C71
Itel Zeno 100