|
71%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB
₹10,749
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
realme Narzo 20A
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB vs realme Narzo 20A
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB vs realme Narzo 20A across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 20A scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,380, while Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB scores 835, making realme Narzo 20A the better performer.
Display: realme Narzo 20A offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB offers 6.22 inches, making realme Narzo 20A the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB and realme Narzo 20A feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB and realme Narzo 20A feature a 12 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB and realme Narzo 20A feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB delivers longer battery life with 22h 58m, while realme Narzo 20A delivers 14h 37m, making Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while realme Narzo 20A offers 32 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB and realme Narzo 20A equally at 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while realme Narzo 20A has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 8 64GB
₹10,749
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 20A
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
12 Oct, 2019
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 439
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.95 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(946,710 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(81,464 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
22h 58m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
173,514
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 12, 2019
(Official)
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.95 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.45 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 505
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
173,514
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
28.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
8.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
17.7 %
|
19.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.48 %
|
82.29 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
89.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
156.4 mm
|
164.4 mm
|
Width
|
75.4 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2.55" sensor size IMX363 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.4µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle 75° field-of-view28 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
22h 58m
|
14h 37m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 35m 6s
|
2h 43m 1s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.339 W/kg Body: 1.000 W/kg
|
Head: 1.18 W/kg Body: 0.631 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|