|
79%
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
vivo V15 Pro
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs vivo V15 Pro
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs vivo V15 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 10,792, while vivo V15 Pro scores 6,604, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro the better performer.
Display: Both Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro and vivo V15 Pro offer the same screen size of 6.39 inches, but vivo V15 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro's AMOLED, making vivo V15 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro and vivo V15 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo V15 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offers 20 MP, making vivo V15 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 45m, while vivo V15 Pro delivers 10h 20m, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro and vivo V15 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro and vivo V15 Pro equally at 8.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro and vivo V15 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.5.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo V15 Pro
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
22 Jul, 2019
|
06 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 855
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.84 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
13 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
3700 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(90,160 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(40,521 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
373,945
AnTuTu Score
|
181,420
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 45m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
10h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Mar 06, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.84 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 640
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
373,945
|
181,420
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
12.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
12.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.4 %
|
17.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.9 %
|
85.17 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.9 %
|
91.64 %
|
Design
Height
|
156.7 mm
|
157.2 mm
|
Width
|
74.3 mm
|
74.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
191 grams
|
185 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size ISO-CELL 0.8µm pixel size |
|
13 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
|
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
4k @60 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3.4" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size |
Camera Type
|
Pop-Up
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
3700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0 58% in 30 minutes
|
Yes Fast Charging 24% in 15 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 45m
|
10h 20m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 12m 46s
|
1h 43m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.03 W/kg Body: 0.72 W/kg
|
Head: 1.155 W/kg Body: 0.284 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
Newspoint Amazon Paytm UC Browser WPS Office
|