|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB
₹17,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
OPPO F11 6GB RAM
₹25,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB vs OPPO F11 6GB RAM
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB vs OPPO F11 6GB RAM across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F11 6GB RAM runs at a higher processing speed of 2.1 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB runs at 2.0 GHz, making OPPO F11 6GB RAM the better performer.
Display: OPPO F11 6GB RAM offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB offers 6.3 inches, making OPPO F11 6GB RAM the larger display of the two. OPPO F11 6GB RAM features a TFT LTPS display compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB's IPS LCD, making OPPO F11 6GB RAM the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB and OPPO F11 6GB RAM feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: OPPO F11 6GB RAM offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB offers 13 MP, making OPPO F11 6GB RAM better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO F11 6GB RAM offers a higher battery capacity with 4020 mAh, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB offers 4000 mAh, making OPPO F11 6GB RAM better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB and OPPO F11 6GB RAM offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO F11 6GB RAM is rated 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO F11 6GB RAM has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB
₹17,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO F11 6GB RAM
₹25,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
10 Apr, 2019
|
10 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT LTPS
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4020 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(321,339 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(16,128 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
181,423
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
14h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 10, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
181,423
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
34.0 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT LTPS
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.21 %
|
83.94 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.2 mm
|
162 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
76.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.3 mm
|
Weight
|
186 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera2.176 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.58 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4020 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 01m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 25m 33s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.962 W/kg Body: 0.838 W/kg
|
Head: 1.190 W/kg Body: 0.600 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|