|
75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
₹9,623
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Moto G9 Power
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Moto G9 Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,495, while Moto G9 Power scores 1,408, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro the better performer.
Display: Moto G9 Power offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers 6.3 inches, making Moto G9 Power the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro and Moto G9 Power feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers 48 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers 13 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G9 Power delivers longer battery life with 28h 44m, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro delivers 14h 01m, making Moto G9 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro and Moto G9 Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Moto G9 Power is rated 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Moto G9 Power has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
₹9,623
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
13 Mar, 2019
|
15 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(849,198 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(32,482 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
181,423
AnTuTu Score
|
169,608
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
28h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 13, 2019
(Official)
|
Dec 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Stock
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
181,423
|
169,608
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
34.0 %
|
61.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.21 %
|
83.31 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
85 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.2 mm
|
172.1 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
186 grams
|
221 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 01m
|
28h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 25m 33s
|
3h 48m 56s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.962 W/kg Body: 0.838 W/kg
|
Head: 0.98 W/kg Body: 1.33 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|