|
75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
₹9,623
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs vivo S1 64GB
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs vivo S1 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,495, while vivo S1 64GB scores 6,037, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro the better performer.
Display: vivo S1 64GB offers a screen size of 6.38 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers 6.3 inches, making vivo S1 64GB the larger display of the two. vivo S1 64GB features a Super AMOLED display compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro's IPS LCD, making vivo S1 64GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while vivo S1 64GB offers 16 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo S1 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro offers 13 MP, making vivo S1 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro delivers longer battery life with 14h 01m, while vivo S1 64GB delivers 12h 55m, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro and vivo S1 64GB offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while vivo S1 64GB has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
₹9,623
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
13 Mar, 2019
|
09 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(849,198 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(7,064 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
181,423
AnTuTu Score
|
146,341
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 13, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Mali-G52
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
181,423
|
146,341
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
34.0 %
|
14.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
404 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.21 %
|
83.12 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.2 mm
|
159.5 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
186 grams
|
179 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 01m
|
12h 55m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 25m 33s
|
1h 52m 11s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.962 W/kg Body: 0.838 W/kg
|
Head: 0.756 W/kg Body: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|