|
74%
realme 3 Pro
₹15,999
@Flipkart
|
74%
realme C35
₹13,999
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme 3 Pro vs realme C35
Comparing the realme 3 Pro vs realme C35 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme 3 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,886, while realme C35 scores 1,307, making realme 3 Pro the better performer.
Display: realme C35 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while realme 3 Pro offers 6.3 inches, making realme C35 the larger display of the two. Both realme 3 Pro and realme C35 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme C35 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while realme 3 Pro offers 16 MP, making realme C35 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: realme 3 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while realme C35 offers 8 MP, making realme 3 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme C35 delivers longer battery life with 14h 50m, while realme 3 Pro delivers 10h 48m, making realme C35 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme 3 Pro and realme C35 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme 3 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while realme C35 is rated 7.
User Rating: realme 3 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while realme C35 has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
realme 3 Pro
₹15,999
@ Flipkart
|
✕
realme C35
₹13,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
29 Apr, 2019
|
12 Mar, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 710
|
Unisoc T616
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4045 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
VOOC Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(351,992 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(199,878 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
120,973
AnTuTu Score
|
187,040
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 48m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹15,999
@ Flipkart
|
₹13,999
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 29, 2019
(Official)
|
Mar 12, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
|
Unisoc T616
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 616
|
Mali-G57 MP1
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
120,973
|
187,040
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
28.2 %
|
28.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
400 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.56 %
|
84.62 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.8 %
|
90.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
156.8 mm
|
164.4 mm
|
Width
|
74.2 mm
|
75.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
172 grams
|
189 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.71/2.6" sensor size IMX519 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.22µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 77° field-of-view26.8 mm focal length 1/2.7" sensor size S5KJN1 ISO-CELL 0.64µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera21.88 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
f/2.8 Depth Camera36.14 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps HD @960 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 1.8µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size Exmor RS 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4045 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 32 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes VOOC Charging v3.0 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 48m
|
14h 50m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 5m 59s
|
2h 17m 57s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.159 W/kg Body: 0.739 W/kg
|
Head: 1.194 W/kg Body: 1.130 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹15,999
@ Flipkart
|
₹13,999
@ Amazon
|