|
75%
realme Narzo 10
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
OPPO A52
₹16,970
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 10 vs OPPO A52
Comparing the realme Narzo 10 vs OPPO A52 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO A52 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,344, while realme Narzo 10 scores 1,340, making OPPO A52 the better performer.
Display: Both realme Narzo 10 and OPPO A52 offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme Narzo 10 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while OPPO A52 offers 12 MP, making realme Narzo 10 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme Narzo 10 and OPPO A52 feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: OPPO A52 delivers longer battery life with 17h 39m, while realme Narzo 10 delivers 12h 56m, making OPPO A52 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 10 and OPPO A52 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both realme Narzo 10 and OPPO A52 equally at 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 10 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO A52 has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
realme Narzo 10
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO A52
₹16,970
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
18 May, 2020
|
18 Jun, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Quick Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(182,207 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(19,965 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
200,306
AnTuTu Score
|
182,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 18, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
200,306
|
182,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
37.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.4 %
|
9.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.29 %
|
83.4 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.8 %
|
90.5 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.4 mm
|
162 mm
|
Width
|
75.4 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
199 grams
|
192 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.826 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.84.05 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.64 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 56m
|
17h 39m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 38m 16s
|
2h 31m 39s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.857 W/kg Body: 0.609 W/kg
|
Head: 1.42 W/kg Body: 1.12 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|